Twitter! Revenge porn! It’s the Jurisprudence Week in Review

mmm, dusty

We’ve had two important internet law cases coming out of Ontario over the last week or so. I have spent the last couple of days trying to figure out which one to write about. After much soul-searching drinking, I’ve decided to write about both. This is probably a mistake.

Continue reading

Posted in: Privacy, The Courts
Tagged: , ,
1 Comment

Happy Holidays and all that jazz

Debate thisThanks so much to steve and the rest of you readers who make blogging about this law stuff a lot of fun. As I predict every year, I am sure this internet thingamajig will take off in 2016. Sooner or later that will come true.

Happy holidays!

Posted in: Site meta
Tagged: ,
1 Comment

The Supreme Court does some technology things

Nice house“Broadcast-incidental copies” does not sound like a major jumping off point for a huge case about copyright and technology, but apparently it is. And now I have to figure out what the hell it means, in light of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in CBC v. SODRAC from a couple of weeks ago. Goddammit.

Continue reading

Posted in: Copyright, The Courts
Tagged:
Leave a comment

Let’s “look” at the TPP

TPPmapHey big news today! And it has brought yours truly out of hiding. So it looks like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a go! What’s the TPP? Damned if I know, because I’ve never seen the TPP agreement. Well, no one has ever seen it! So why is your humble blogger talking about it? A couple of lines on a government website have me perturbed. Let’s find out which ones.

Continue reading

Posted in: Commentary, Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,
9 Comments

Law-talking guy invading your TV again

If you turn on Canada AM these days, chances are you’re gonna see some random lawyer dude who doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Or, you know, me. So here’s me this week talking about all the data that the smartphone fitness apps and wearables are collecting when you’re out there getting your ass in shape. Who owns that data? What are the legal issues surrounding it? Damned if I know. But damned if that doesn’t stop me from attempting to answer that question on national TV! Here’s some background for you.

Kudos to CTV for finally allowing their video to be embedded. It’s the internet way. Also, thanks to Bev Thompson who was a delight. I have now hit for the cycle of Canada AM hosts.

Posted in: Privacy
Tagged:
10 Comments

B.C. Court of Appeal stretches reach to far corners of the planet

guilty guilty guiltyMy two loyal readers may remember the case of Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc. OK, even I admit I had trouble remembering it, since I wrote about it almost a year ago and a year is forever in internet time. But it sounded vaguely familiar, so I Googled myself (ha!). And what I found was that I was quite prescient, for the title of that post was “This hugely important Google case will be going on for a while…” Well I got that right! I wrote in that post that “I still think the Court of Appeal will overturn the order in the end”. Well about 10 days ago the BC Court of Appeal decision came down and I got that… less right.

Continue reading

Posted in: The Courts
Tagged:
2 Comments

When is a Facebook threat a “threat”?

Irony can be pretty ironicOn Monday this week the U.S. Supreme Court came down with their decision in  the case of Elonis v. United States, which is all about a terrible rap lyricist threatening to kill or hurt a bunch of people on Facebook. Let’s take a look at the decision and see if it has any implications for Canada (spoiler alert – it does not! It’s U.S. law!).

Continue reading

Posted in: The Courts, United States internet law
Tagged:
2 Comments

We have a notice! Let’s rip it to shreds.

notice thisThe entire editorial team and staff here at AM.com have been anxiously waiting for someone to forward them a notice that they received through their ISP under the new notice and notice regime. Well, jackpot! We received one about a month ago, and since then we have received several more. A very kind person has allowed me to reprint it here, as a public service. And I will be ripping it apart.

Continue reading

Posted in: Copyright
Tagged: ,
33 Comments