Tagged - why internet law is important to YOU

Hooray for the CRTC!

All powerful, all knowing

Look, I don’t like praising a public regulator any more than you like reading about me praising a public regulator. Yet when the CRTC strengthens net neutrality in Canada while our friends down south are essentially f*cked on the same subject, you gotta do what you gotta do.

Continue reading

Posted in: Regulatory regime in Canada
Tagged: ,
2 Comments

Dispatches from the world of internet law for March 2017

Im THINKING dammit

I’m still thinking about what to write!

Sometimes you have have a lot to write about and sometimes you have nothing to write about. This is one of those times. So let’s write about all of it. And none of it.

Continue reading

Posted in: Copyright, Site meta, Uncategorized, United States internet law
Tagged: , , ,
4 Comments

Québec government solves all gambling problems forever

I raise you $10Sure, it has to block a few websites to do it, but isn’t that a small price to pay?

Continue reading

Posted in: Regulatory regime in Canada, Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,
4 Comments

Dog poo + Facebook = $65,000

Irony can be pretty ironicThat may be the best headline I’ve ever written. It should technically be “Dog poo + pedophilia + Facebook = $65,000”, but I was scared of what kind of click bait that would be. Thank you, B.C. Supreme Court!

Continue reading

Posted in: Defamation, The Courts
Tagged: , ,
3 Comments

We have a notice! Let’s rip it to shreds.

notice thisThe entire editorial team and staff here at AM.com have been anxiously waiting for someone to forward them a notice that they received through their ISP under the new notice and notice regime. Well, jackpot! We received one about a month ago, and since then we have received several more. A very kind person has allowed me to reprint it here, as a public service. And I will be ripping it apart.

Continue reading

Posted in: Copyright
Tagged: ,
74 Comments

Bell wants to appeal “net neutrality” decision

All bits are equal - fucking A

Net neutrality is VERY important dammit. For the internet legal types (hello!) it’s always one of the most important topics of discussion around the ol’ water cooler. So when a communications behemoth like Bell decides to appeal a big neutrality decision, it should be a huge story. Like earlier this week, when it was widely reported that Bell Mobility filed some appeal documents in the Federal Court of Canada. But there are some real misconceptions about all this that yours truly is here to clear up in my usual irascible way.

Continue reading

Posted in: Regulatory regime in Canada, The Courts
Tagged: ,
5 Comments

Only 4 days left until Google takes over your life

I love the smell of Google in the morningAlmost a month ago, Google announced some changes to their Terms of Service, including something that caused quite the hubbub, shared endorsements. You’ve got just a few days left to take action to avoid seeing your face in Google Ads. Well, unless you want to, you narcissist. Let’s take a good look at the new Terms of Service. What other fun stuff did Google put in?

Continue reading

Posted in: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,
14 Comments

Tour the interwebz with a lawyer as your guide

It may take a while

As the summer winds down, we’ve been feeling kind of philosophical. What does it all mean, and all that. As a practicing lawyer, I tend to focus on the little picture. We’ve got a problem, it relates to one thing, we try to solve it. FOCUS, dammit. That translates to the way I’ve written here at AM.com. A new piece of legislation passes, an interesting court case comes out, some government body releases a report, and we write about the minute details of a very small slice of law and the internet. We’ve never really looked at the big picture and the big issues. Until now.

Continue reading

Posted in: Commentary, Internet law basics
Tagged: ,
4 Comments